Answer:
Floating cost adjustment is 3.25%
Explanation:
Flotation-adjusted cost of equity = (Expected dividend at the end of Year 1 / Net proceeds per share) + Growth rate.
Expected dividend at the end of Year 1 (D1) = $ 2.30 (given in question)
Net proceeds per share = (21.30 - 4 % of 21.30) = $ 20.448
Flotation-adjusted cost of equity = (2.30 / 20.448) + 0.04
= 0.1125 + 0.04
= 0.1525 i.e., 15.25 %.
Flotation cost adjustment = Flotation-adjusted cost of equity - Cost of equity without flotation adjustment.
= 15.25 % - 12 % (given in question)
= 3.25 %.
Conclusion:- Flotation cost adjustment = 3.25 %
B) If the price elasticity of demand is zero, then all of the tax burdens fall on the sellers (perfectly inelastic).
<h3><u>How does price elasticity work?</u></h3>
A measure of a product's consumption change in response to a price change is called price elasticity of demand. Price elasticity is a tool used by economists to analyze how changes in a product's price affect its supply and demand. Supply has an elasticity similar to demand, and it's called the price elasticity of supply.
The relationship between a change in supply and a change in price is referred to as price elasticity of supply. By dividing the percentage change in quantity supplied by the percentage change in price, it is determined. What products are produced at what prices depends on the interaction of the two elasticities.
Learn more about price elasticity with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/13565779
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. The stock's price one year from now is expected to be 5% above the current price.
Explanation:
Under gordon model:
If we calculate the value of the stock for the year after that:
to calculate the value of the increase we divide next year over current year.
We have demostrate that next year stock should increase by 1 + growth so statement c is correct.
Answer:
C. the study of strategy and strategic behavior.
Explanation:
Game theory is the study of strategy and strategic behavior. It is assumed that the parties involved are rational. The payoff of a player of a game is determined by the actions of others in the game.
A popular example of game theory is the prisoners dilemma.
A game theory can involve more than two players.
An example of prisoners dilemma:
There are two prisoners - if both confess to a crime, they both get 5 years in prison. If both prisoners don't confess they are set free. If one confess and the other doesn't, the prisoner that confesses 2 years in prison while the other prisoner that didn't confess gets 10 years in prison.
The dominant strategy which is the best option for the prisoner regardless of what the other prisoner does is to confess.
The Nash equilibrium is for both prisoners to defect.
I hope my answer helps you
