Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, Social accountability requires that companies will behave in a way that promotes community in order to increase the shareholder interest. lnvestors as well as customers looking for projects which are not really successful but also commit to the health of people and the ecosystem are becoming progressively crucial for public accountability.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.
Answer:
Adjusted balance: 1,801 dollars
Explanation:
Bank statement balance: 1,921
outstanding checks (300)
bank mistake <u> 180 </u>
adjusted bank balance 1,801
Cash account balance: 1,900
service charge (25)
Interest earned 1
car insurance expense <u> (75)</u>
Adjusted Balance: 1,801
We adjust each party for mistake and unknow information.
The bank made a mistake and is unaware of the outstanding checks
Joe didn't know about the insurance amount, the service charge nor the interest thus, it need to record and adjust for this value.
Answer:
Income Statement
Revenue $24,698
Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits $8,815
Purchased Transportation $1,203
Fuel Expense $3,228
Rental and landing fees $1,748
Depreciation Expense $925
Maintenance and repairs expense $1,573
Provision for income taxes $805
Other expense (revenue) net <u>$4,995</u>
Total Expenses <u>$23,292</u>
Net Income <u>$1,406</u>
Answer:
weighted-average contribution margin= $4.7
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Hurricane lamps account for 70 percent of the units sold, while the flashlights account for the remaining 30 percent of unit sales. The unit sales price of the lamps is $9.00, and the unit variable cost is $4.00. The unit sales price of the flashlights is $7.00, and the unit variable cost is $3.00.
<u>To calculate the weighted-average contribution margin, we need to calculate first the weighted-average selling price and weighted average variable cost for each product.</u>
weighted average selling price= (selling price* weighted sales participation)
weighted average selling price= (0.7*9 + 0.3*7)= $8.4
weighted average variable cost= (variable cost* weighted sales participation)
weighted average variable cost= (0.7*4 + 0.3*3)= 3.7
<u>Now, we can calculate the weighted average contribution margin:</u>
weighted-average contribution margin= 8.4 - 3.7= $4.7
Suppose in studying Climate Change we discover that in one country, deserts are going to be created where formerly there was grasslands and an abundance of water and in another place the coastlines are going to be altered. If you are an American, how do you think a politician is going to respond to such a problem.
Will his/her response be well thought out based on scientific preparedness, or will he (or she) grab onto the first solution suggestion to him/her and try and implement that?
Whatever he/she does, it will cost and everyone will be affected. A starting place is to find out what presidents in the past have done. During the Bush administration (the second Bush), there was an oil crisis. He responded by allocating more acreage to the growing of corn so supplementing oil production. Replaceable resources for non renewable ones. Sounded like a very good solution, but was it? As it turned out, no. He was robbing Peter to pay Paul. Thousands of people suffered (and died) with that decision because food is much more important than solving transportation problems at the expense of food.
The same is true here. If a solution is sought for global warming, politicians have to be well aware of what they are doing. And that has to be studied very carefully.
