Answer:
Hello the options related to your question is missing below are the missing options
A. She administered punishment to Vihaan.
B. She misused the ERG theory with Vihaan.
C. She failed to provide procedural justice.
D. She misused the expectancy theory with Vihaan.
answer : She failed to provide procedural justice. ( C )
Explanation:
Pari has a managerial problem because she failed to provide procedural Justice
Procedural justice is simply treating every employee equally as regards to a certain work procedure at the workplace, Pari did not exhibit that when she excepted Vihaan
Cate can claim Amy as a dependent.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The custodial parents can claim their child as the dependent, as a qualifying child for head of household filing status, for EIC, for the child tax credit and so on. But in case the parents get divorced, then the parent with whom the child spends the most time gets to claim the child as dependent.
In the above case, since Amy stays with Cate, Cate gets to claim Amy as dependent because she is staying with Cate only and spends the most time with her.
Answer:
(4) The the actual (or real) free cash flow (after inflation rate is considered)
2021 (First Year): $980.39
2022 (Second Year): $961.17
(5) Present value of the investment (Investment year is 2020) is $1,735.54
Explanation:
Free cash flow in 2021: $1000
Free cash flow in 2022: $1000
WACC (discounting rate): 10%
(4) The the actual (or real) free cash flow (after inflation rate is considered) in 2021 (First Year) and 2022 (Second Year):
FCF in 2021 after considering inflation = $1000/(1+2%) = $980.39
FCF in 2022 after considering inflation = $1000/((1+2%)^2) = $961.17
(5) Present value of the investment (Investment year is 2020)
PV = Cash flow in year 1/(1+ discounting rate) + Cash flow in year 2/(1+ discounting rate)^2
= 1000/(1+10%) +1000/((1+10%)^2)
=1,735.54