Answer:
the government can clearly justify the restriction
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, prior restraint on the press is only acceptable if the government can clearly justify the restriction. Otherwise the government cannot add any restrictions against the press because they have freedom of speech and of the press. Which if violated would cause an uproar of the people and lead to many protests.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The answer that will fit best in the question above is
gentrification. It is because this is the process of having to be able to do an
improvement or do some renovating in terms of a particular thing in which is a
way of developing something into a more middle class taste.
Answer:
assumption of the risk
Explanation:
Here the assumption of risk is applied as the party who is injured is already aware of the risk but still wants to continue with the dangerous activity according to his wish. Also this doctrine does not permit an individual to recover the injuries i.e. substained as the party is already exposed himself for a danger
In addition to this, the risk of harm already built in the activity and the injured party also wants to participated in this kind of activity where he is well known
Therefore the given situation represent the assumption of the risk
