A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
Study more in the subjects your grades are low in
The correct opinion is a lack of a diversity of opinions.
The greatest downside to media conglomerates is that the conglomerates view often becomes the view of all of the sub media entities.
The end result is that consumers are really only getting the world view of a few executives from a small group of conglomerates.
