Why did Alexander the Great's men turn against him after he was called the "Great King"?

History

1 answer:

gregori [183]3 years ago

8 0

Alexander the Great's men turn against him after he was called the "Great King" because of his qualities.

Explanation:

Alexander the Great was a king of Macedonia who dominated an empire that expanded from the Balkans to modern-day Pakistan.

He was great leader and vision of conquering the entire world was ended because of his illness. He is a inspiring and courageous leader always dedicated to training his men on war skills and making strategies.

He always rewarded them with honors and titles. He has cultivated devotion and confidence on the each and every member of the army to fight against the enemies.

In his prime time, Alexander was young, beautiful and charismatic which helped to increase his influence on his soldiers fight for him to conquer the world. Every man looked at him when he was called the Great King because of his qualities. Even the modern-day military is analyzing the war strategy adopted by Alexander.

You might be interested in

Select the correct answer.

Vsevolod [243]

Answer: D.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

The American presidential system is different from most parliamentary systems because

LuckyWell [14K]

This system is distinguished from others because it has a chief executive (the president) who is chosen by the people to serve a limited term in office with a distinct separation of powers (the executive branch) as well as specific limitations on exactly what he/she can do while in office.

8 0

3 years ago

The Dutch located trading posts near harbors and rivers, such as the Hudson, in the early 1600s because 1. they were more famili

algol [13]

Is this a statement or a question?

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a republic, elected officials create laws to regulate the economy. Т F

Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

What occurred during the Holocaust, and how did this affect post-World War Il politics?

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

Those who examine the impact of the Holocaust on politics deal with the extent, depth, type, and dynamics of the impact but not with the impact itself. The impact itself is considered axiomatic because it is so sweeping and vast. Since the issue is so large and made up of so many overt and covert associations - direct and indirect, Jewish and pan-human, immediate and belated, ethical and practical - a general framework that presents and diagnoses the matter becomes, by nature, a telegraphic prologue to innumerable studies already carried out and yet to come.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago