Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
So all the power isnt in one persons hands, and because if checks and balances werent here one person would hold all the power which would be bad :)
<span>Colonists used the natural resources to make their living. Some grew crops, cut lumber of caught fish. Others used those resources to make products.
Hope this helps:))</span>
Answer:
The Agōgē
Explanation:
Was a training program built for all male Spartans, except the firstborn in the ruling house.
the answer to the question is false
