Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

8

A person, years after committing a serious crime, is found living under a false identity over 1,000 miles from where the person

used to live. the person's memory of the crime, and of other earlier events, is intact. most likely this is a case of:

1 answer:

Luba_88 [7]3 years ago

3 0

The answer is the person has no mental disorder

You might be interested in

When first accused of committing a crime, a guilty person will most likely____.

liubo4ka [24]

The guilty person will most likely deny the accusation. It is highly unlikely that he/she will immediately confess. Often times, the guilty person does not confess at all.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The most stable country in central america, that is also the region's oldest democractic republic is:

barxatty [35]

The most stable country in Central America, that is also the region's oldest Democratic Republic would be,

Costa Rica

Have a nice day, I hope this helps. :)

6 0

3 years ago

Write a two-stanza poem in free verse about your suggestion on how to address social inequality during this pandemic.

Zinaida [17]

Considering the content of the question, to write a two-stanza poem in free verse about my suggestion on how to address social inequality during this pandemic, start with "<em><u>How long are we to suffer social inequality?"</u></em>

<h3>The entire two-stanza poem goes thus:</h3>

Stanza 1

How long are we to suffer social inequality?;

In my thought, I suggest improving economic inclusion;

Through this, we generate more work and increased income;

By this, we improve social service.

Stanza 2

Again, I wonder how long are we to suffer social inequality?

To solve this issue, let's create safe mobility;

Solve erratic migration;

And develop fair and pro-equality fiscal policies.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various means by which we can solve the issue of social inequality during a pandemic.

Learn more about Social Inequality here: brainly.com/question/3409625

3 0

3 years ago

A former construction worker became intoxicated one night and decided to move some heavy construction equipment that was parked

ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

The possible answers are:

A . Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.

B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.

C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.

D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.

The correct answer is:

B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.

Explanation:

The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.

8 0

4 years ago

PLZ I NEED HELP QUICK

Ipatiy [6.2K]

The first one is the correct answer.

8 0

4 years ago