It is not fair in my opinion, because the 50 year old has already lived a life, where as the 20 year old hasn't. The 50 year old has already has done things in his or her life that the 20 year old won't be able to do. For example, when the 20 year old gets out of jail he will be 80 meaning he may never experience things such as getting married, having children, and etc. The 50 year old may have already done those things in his or her life, so it is very unfair to the 20 year old. The sentencing is also unfair due to the fact being both of them committed the crime and should have the same time served in jail.
Hint: that the last sentence might not hold up due to the fact of what he or she did and it pertains to how serve the crime was for both parties. Such as one person killed someone, while the other one didn't pull the trigger but was an accomplice or new about the killing. So it really depends on the crime or crimes the person has committed.
Answer:
its 35 miles per day
Explanation:
25, and 50 is wrong. its also day, not hour. so second option.
This house of the Jason is investment asset because he is not living up in his Ogden’s house while people (sports enthusiast and their families) are willing to take that house on rent.
Explanation:
According to me this house is a very good investment asset because people (sports enthusiast and their families) are willing to take that house on rent while he is not living up there. The every month rent money can be seen as the good lifetime investment or return cost of his property.
This property is real estate which is good source of generating money to continuous years or lifetime though he need to spend on damage or maintenance cost.
