Answer:
.
a person advocating or supporting republican government.
Answer:
Explanation: irms will engage in non-price competition, in spite of the additional costs involved, because it is usually more profitable than selling for a lower price and avoids the risk of a price war. For example, brand-name goods often sell more units than do their generic counterparts, despite usually being more expensive. i hope this was helpful to u
The correct answer is customs.
Customs refers to the social thought that portrays a customary, designed method for carrying on that is viewed as normal for life in a social framework. Shaking hands, bowing and kissing are on the whole traditions. They're methods for welcome individuals that assistance to recognize one society from another.
Answer:
D. Classical perspective
Explanation:
This perspective of management as propounded by some scholars, namely; Max Weber, Frederick Winslow Taylor, and Henri Fayol. This perspective uses scientific analysis to analyze employees in an organization by increasing the value of their impacts on an organization.
Frederick Winslow Taylor propounded the scientific methods of management. He was of the view that employees' influence in an organization can be quantified using a scientific approach. Max Weber came up with the idea of bureaucracy in an organization. He believed that, managerial roles in an organization would run smoothly with the application of bureaucracy. Henri Fayol also followed the same path as the earlier mentioned theorists. He created some functions of management, namely; planning, organizing, leading, and controlling.
In the weighted point product evaluation method, if more than one support person evaluates competing products, the score a product receives is usually the average score of all evaluators.
The weighted point product evaluation method, or Kepner-Tregoe method, compares technology products according to criteria of predefined importance, such as their cost or how easy they are for the consumer to use. The result is a numerical score for each competing product; the "winner" being the product with the highest score.
The people conducting the evaluations can of course disagree. In this case, a product's final score is the average of the different evaluators' scores for this product.
