Answer:
The general level of family's income is directly proportional to the amount of cash a family is likely to hold
Explanation:
Of the three motives of money, transactional motives of money relates to holding money(whether at hand or at bank) to meet daily transaction e.g buying of fuel/gas, transport fare to work place.
If the level of income of a family increases, other things being equal, the family tends to hold more money for their daily transaction. The level of income is directly proportional to amount of cash a family holds...
For example, family A earns $100 per week and holds $30 to meet daily transaction or unforeseen circumstances. If his pay increases to$150, it is intuitive for Mr A to hold higher money, lets say $50
Answer: An ethical dilemma
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma is a situation where an individual is faced with making a decision between two options where if any option is chosen the individual might act against his/her moral principle. Like in the question, John is faced with the option of either complaining about child labor and then the child losses his/her source of income or allowing things to be as they already are.
Answer:
Comparative advertisements need legal support for their claims and must not misrepresent competing products/brands
Explanation:
Comparative advertisement is also called advertising war. A competitor is named in the advertisement and reasons are given why the competitor's product is inferior to the one being advertised.
In this type of advertisement to prevent adverse legal action the company needs to carry out extensive research to provide legal backing for their claims.
Firms must also not misrepresent the competitor's product as this can lead to legal action.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
$62,160
Explanation:
Given:
Purchase price = $300,000
Down payment = 10% of purchase price = 0.1 × $300,000 = $30,000
Thus,
the cumulative amount to be financed = $300,000 - $30,000 = $270,000
The present value of an annuity of $1 per year for 8 years at 16% = $4.3436
Now,
Annual payment
= ( Cumulative Amount financed ) / ( Cumulative PV factor at 16% for 8 years)
= $270,000 / 4.3436
= $62,160.42
≈ $62,160
