Answer:
$ 4242.76
Explanation:
Annual payment = rP / (1 - ( 1 + r)^-n)
r = rate = 9.5%
P = the amount borrowed = $ 21000
n = number of years
Annual payment = 0.095 ($ 21 000) / ( 1 - (1 + 0.095)⁻⁷ ) = $ 4242.76
Answer:
$96,154.20
Explanation:
We are to find the future value of the annuity
The formula for calculating future value = A (B / r)
B = [(1 + r)^n] - 1
A = Amount
R = interest rate
N = number of years
[(1.08)^9 - 1 ] / 0.08 = 12.487558
12.487558 x $7,700 = $96,154.20
Answer:
mentor
Explanation:
According to my research on business roles and responsibilities, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the president realizes that you are acting as a mentor to junior employees. This is defined as a person has an expertise in a certain area, and gives advice or trains another individual (usually younger than you). This is what you seem to be doing with the younger employees that gravitate towards you for advice.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<span>I would tell Jenna that she first needs to research what the 7 on the bottom of the bottles means. This number is in reference to the specific type of plastic used in the bottles. She needs to make sure this plastic has not been deemed as dangerous for infants. Once cleared, she should thoroughly wash the bottles and use them.</span>
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
