Answer:
The current Republican administration and the Republican-controlled Congress seem to support less government expenditure. Spokesman Ryan, as a rule, has shown a bias for fiscal discipline. President Trump went on a campaign that pledged government expenditure to save employment but did not generally deliver, and his position against the ACA showed a desire to reduce state action. It is also clear from the income cap that the state will get less revenue and that its expenditure and capacity to act will be lowered. Recent occurrences in Puerto Rico and the absence of complete assistance for the island represent less public action. <u>I think that this pattern will persist at least until the next Congressional elections.</u>
<u></u>
Because of increasing sea ice.
In climate change taking place since then, there has been an opposite problem. Beginning in the late 19th century, a reduction of sea ice has been progressing in the Arctic regions. The pace of ice mass loss has been accelerating especially since the 1970s. In the first decade of the 21st century, Greenland's ice loss accelerated at a rate of 30 gigatonnes a year.
During the early 2000s, the most popular music file-sharing service in comparison with others is: Napster.
A music file-sharing service refers to an online platform that has a network of computers to allow its end users store and stream digital musical files over the Internet, as well as download music for offline playback. Some examples of a music file-sharing service are:
Napster is a music file-sharing service that was established and launched on 1st of June, 1999. It typically started the digital music revolution by pioneering peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing of digital musical files in the early 2000s.
In conclusion, Napster was the most popular music file-sharing service in the early 2000s.
Read more on file-sharing here: brainly.com/question/6251970
Answer:
change to English the I can help
Explanation:
i don't understand that language
The impact of <em>Paula Lehner's use of the word </em><em>"tools"</em><em> in paragraph 3 of "Fight Fire with Fire"</em> is <em>C. It emphasizes that </em><em>prescribed burns </em><em>should be used only under specific conditions.</em>
Prescribed or controlled burns are used when the conditions are right <em>to create forest access, reduce insects, and increase the health of plants and the environment.</em> On the other hand, prescribed burns can damage the environment and pollute the air, but wildfires create far worse situations.
The word "tools" does not mean that
- <em>A. It minimizes the emotional reaction people often have to prescribed burns. </em>
- <em>B. It indicates that using prescribed burns in firefighting is similar to other trades </em>
- <em> D. It suggests that prescribed burns have costs similar to other implements used by firefighters.</em>
Thus, according to Paula Lehner, prescribed burns should be used as tools to prevent wildfires.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/15657935
