Answer:
Britain defended its colonial policies by arguing that the colonists had <u>virtual</u> representation in Parliament. The colonists insisted they must have <u>actual</u> representation.
Explanation:
While the colonists insisted on having their own, legitimate representation in the British Parliament, British officials argued that they were already properly represented via virtual representation. According to them, the Parliament did not have in mind only the interests of those who elected its members but of all British subjects, of everyone who resided on the territory of the British Empire.
A mixed economy permits private participation in production, which in return allows healthy competition that can result in profit.
This close alliance, which was based on mutual respect and good treatment from both sides, led the natives to side with the french in their conflicts with the english settlers that came later in the 1600s and into the mid 1700s. Relations between the natives and english were not nearly as good.
Hope this help you :)
Answer:
The case is in the jury selection phase, and the trial will follow.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about a scenerio whereby Lawyers for each side of a case are questioning people who received a jury summons. The part of the trial process this describe jury selection phase and the trial will follow. During this jury selection phase, Lawyers as well as judges will proceed with selection of juries, which is “voir dire,” process, and it implies truth speaking, some questions will be asked from the potential jurors by the judge and attorneys,the question is to know their competency of serving in the case, then the next thing that will follow is the trial
Answer:
The Romans used gold, silver, and bronze coins for trade and to pay taxes. Goods came to the Roman Republic from several regions outside of Italy. Roman soldiers were paid with goods from all over the region
