"The mystique of inside information—"if you only knew what we know"—was a most effective way to defend the national-security mon
opoly and prevent democratic control of foreign policy . . . The power to leak meant the power to tell the people what it served the government’s purpose that they should know . . . The power to withhold and the power to leak led on inexorably to the power to lie. The secrecy system instilled in the executive branch the idea that foreign policy was no one’s business save its own, and the uncontrolled secrecy made it easy for lying to become routine." -Arthur Schlesinger, The Imperial Presidency, 1973 Which of the following governmental policies would the author most likely support?
a. the obama administration’s 2016 decision not to enforce immigration laws mandating the deportation of undocumented young people
b. the gulf of tonkin resolution of 1964, which authorized the president to do whatever was necessary to aid us allies in southeast asia
c. the war powers resolution of 1973, which aimed to give congress more say in whether us troops were deployed abroad
d. the patriot act of 2001, which expanded government surveillance measures in order to combat terrorism
c. the war powers resolution of 1973, which aimed to give congress more say in whether us troops were deployed abroad
Explanation:
Arthur Schlesinger, The Imperial Presidency, 1973 was a criticism of the constitution not working as it should, where he believed that the executive branch has too much power in implementing various degree of policy such as foreign policy. Under the Imperilled Presidency he is of the opinion that Congress should be more effective in it oversight as clearly stated in the constitution.
Arthur Schlesinger would most likely support the War Powers Resolution of 1973 which was designed to limit the U.S. president's ability to initiate or escalate military actions abroad restricting.
<span>The cause could be attentional saturation - where you use or see an item often and know what it looks like.With the cobination of seeing/using it often blurs what it actually looks like or what the details of the item are.</span>
If Presidents were elected for life, we would not be the same. Everything would not change and we wouldn't get a chance to see something new. If its a bad president, bad things will keep happening. But, f it's a good president, good things will happen.