not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
They were independent people who didn't government inferring with their daily lives
Alexis de tocqueville referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as <u>"the tyranny of the majority".</u>
The idea of the tyranny of the majority was advanced by the nineteenth century political scholars Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It alludes to a circumstance in which the greater part implements its will on a distraught minority through the equitable procedure. That is the thing that various minority bunches in the UK are encountering after Leave won the submission. Unexpectedly, this result has hurt the interests of the minority, as well as that of the dominant part that bolstered Brexit.
Answer:
culture of poverty
Explanation:
Culture of poverty -
The term was coined , by the anthropologist Oscar Lewis .
According to this concept , the people undergoing the phase of poverty , plays a wide role for maintaining the cycle of poverty all across the various generations, is referred to as culture of poverty.
Hence, from the given statement of the question, the correct term for the given information of the question is culture of poverty.
Ku Klux Klan
Known as the KKK
<span>Was founded as a social club for Confederate veterans </span>
Started in Tennessee in 1866
Memberships grew in the south
Word violent terrorists organizations
1868 it existed in pretty much every southern state
<span>Goal</span>
