The answer is helplessness theory or learned helplessness. It is when people feel helpless to avoid negative situations because previous experience has shown them that they do not have control. An example is imagine that you just failed a major test. There are some things that you could say were the reason for that: 'I'm stupid.' 'I didn't study hard enough.' 'The test was too hard.'
Each of those reasons can be seen as a not the same type of attribution. An attribution is an aspect that a person blames for the consequence of a situation. The three types of attribution is global, stable, and internal. An internal attribution is any attribution that gives the root of an event as something to do with the person, as contrasting to something in the outside world. A stable attribution is one that doesn't change over time or across situations. Finally, a global attribution is the acceptance that the factors affecting the consequence relates to a large number of situations, not just one of them.
The answer to this question is: <span>individual action and personal responsibility
In general, business people in united states do not care about everything else as long as you can give results.
This really different in Asian culture for example, where most of the business people often value politeness and respectful behaviors.</span>
It has been theorized that increased awareness of death, called mortality salience, leads people to have lighter penalties to those who break moral cultural traditions, respond more positively to people who criticize their country, show disrespect for cultural icons, such as flags. give larger rewards to people who uphold cultural standards.
That a lot of people believe that balancing the federal government's budget equally with spending cuts and higher taxes is a good option.
Hope this helps you. :)
<span>Pax Romana is the peace that existed between nationalities within the Roman Empire.</span>
