Finding everyone's willingness to pay is costly and difficult is one major hurdle monopolies face to engage in first-degree price discrimination.
Price discrimination is a promoting approach that prices clients different charges for the same product or service primarily based on what the seller thinks they could get the client to conform to. In pure charge discrimination, the seller costs every customer the maximum fee they will pay.
There are three types of price discrimination that you may stumble upon: first-degree, second degree and third degree. Those stages sometimes move by way of different names: customized pricing, product versioning or menu pricing, and group pricing, respectively.
Companies benefit from rate discrimination because it may entice purchasers to purchase large portions in their products or it may inspire in any other case bored stiff patron businesses to purchase products or services.
Learn more about price discrimination here:- brainly.com/question/23342760
#SPJ4
<span>-Family can help take care of the child
-family can offer help and advice
-there is a close family bond
-they always have someone to talk to
-grandparents see their grandchildren growing up
-children have cousins to play with</span>Disadvantages of an extended family<span>-family may interfere or take care
-lack of privacy and space
-too many visitors
-disagreement on how to bring up the children</span>
Raw cotton crops doubled each decade after 1800 because farmers grew nothing else. The cotton gin sped production and the "de-seeding" of cotton so much that the economy improved so farmers stuck with cotton.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
O Life for small rural landowners was easier in the countryside than in the cities. O Large countryside villas provided wealthy Romans with all the goods they needed. ... O Wealthy Romans had more power in the countryside than in cities, where plebeians dominated
Explanation:
Answer:
In simple words, The Federalists presumed that this amendment was not appropriate since they thought that, as it stands, the Legislature restricted only the legislature, not the citizens. The Anti-Federalists argued that the Charter granted so much authority to the national government, and the population would be at threat of tyranny without a Bill of Rights.
