One of the main ways in which the passage of the GI bill changed American cities and towns is that it helped reduce income inequality--since it provided for the free college education of veterans returning from war--many of whom would have had to take lower-paying jobs without being able to utilize the GI bill.
http://law.emory.edu/eilr/recent-developments/volume-32/essays/myth-u-n-collective-security.html
A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.
A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.
<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>
Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.
Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.
Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.
Answer: More people volunteered to serve in the United States military
Explanation:
Answer:
The USMCA, which substituted the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a mutually beneficial win for North American workers, farmers, ranchers, and businesses. The Agreement creates more balanced, reciprocal trade supporting high-paying jobs for Americans and grow the North American economy.
