nderstood,
Answer:
Justification of the Colonists' Declaration of Independence from England Were the colonist justified in declaring independence from England? I feel that they had plenty of just cause to separate themselves. England was taxing the colonies without fair representation in Parliament, the British also took
away the right to assemble, and they were using different tactics to attempt to intimidate the colonists.
One of the greatest thing that angered the colonists was the taxation without representation. The British government had good reason to tax the colonies, because they just went to war to defend them. That they u but they didn't appreciate the fact that they didn't have a say into how the but they didn't appreciate the fact that they didn't have a say into how the debt would be paid. The British passed the Townshend Acts to offset the war debt. This caused the colonist to reinstate the boycott on luxury items. England then passes the Tea Act taxing imported tea, but also gives the British East Indian Tea co. a complete monopoly.
Explanation:
Britain and Ireland are the main ones, followed by (not sure if all of them)
around The UK:
<span>Shetland
Orkney
Outer and Inner Hebrides </span>
Wight
Sheppey
Hayling
Anglesey
<span>
Greece:
Crete
Lesbos
Rhodes
Chios
</span>
In the Atlantic close to Europe:
Azores
Canary Islands
Faroe Islands
Iceland
Greenland
Danish and Swedish Islands:
<span>Bornholm
Zealand</span>
Lolland
Gotland
Orust
<span>Mediterranean:
Sicily
Sardinia
Malta
Elba
Corsica
Balearic Islands
St. Paul's Island
Greece:
Crete
Lesbos
Rhodes
Chios
</span>
Hope this helped.
Answer:I n the mid-1230s, the rulers of England were confronted with a problem concerning. Church law legitimized children born out of wedlock whose parents subsequently married. English lay law did not legitimize such children.
Explanation:
Political science nowadays is considered by some to be more conflict-oriented. The main goal beneath every debate is to overcome the adversary, instead of the strengthening, or even creation, of ideas (as any debate's goal should be).
Machiavelli teachings were mostly known from his <em>Magnum Opus</em> (masterpiece) 'The Prince', which was written to orientate princes on how to win wars and claim their domain over lesser regions. It was thought for a time flooded with wars in the apex of the Renaissance era, in a very troubled Europe! These teachings were followed and applied by great political dictators on their huge domination campaigns over the centuries, like Napoléon Bonaparte and the WWII dictators in the next century.
Taking in consideration that it's a basic war strategy to learn how an enemy thinks in order to overcome him, these <em>machiavellic</em> teachings and strategies were also studied by the enemies of these dictators (even though, in case of WWII, the 'enemies' have never known a dictatorial government). And so his aggressive philosophies were passed on even within democratic governments through the generations to follow until the present day.
