Brand management.
Explaination: Basically the most legit answer
Answer:
Letter B is correct. <u>Narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</u>
Explanation:
Case study is an investigative methodological approach applied to simple or applied social sciences. It is carried out through the use of different qualitative methods for the collection of data and information relevant to the foundation of the research. The qualitative method is the most appropriate in a case study, as it occurs through subjective and not substantially statistical means of in-depth analysis of relevant factors in an event, an individual, an institution, a group and others.
Case studies can be classified as:
- exploratory,
- descriptive, or
- explanatory.
So it is correct to state that the purpose of the case study is to reduce the difference between theory and practice. Because the analysis of the information collected and the variables and patterns found will provide subsidies for the discussion and better understanding and reasoning between what happens between the theory and the practice analyzed in the case study.
The answer is C. analyze your current personal and financial situation
Answer:
Stock B has a standard deviation of 14%. The portfolio contains 40% of stock A, and the correlation coefficient between the two stocks is -.23. A) 9.7% B)
Explanation:
Stock B has a standard deviation of 14%. The portfolio contains 40% of stock A, the portfolio contains 60% of stock B, and the correlation coefficient between the two stocks is -.23. A. 9.7% B. 12.2% C. 14% ... The standard deviation of return on investment A is .10, while the standard deviation of return on investment B is .05.
Answer:
$20 million
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Book value of assets in 2005 = $1,200 million
Fair value of assets in 2005 = $955 million
Book value of assets in 2006 = $720 million
Fair value of assets in 2006 = $700 million
Now,
Impairment Loss = Fair value - Carrying value of Net assets
or
Impairment Loss
= Fair value of assets in 2006 - book value of assets in 2006
= $700 million - $720 million
= - $20 million [ Here, the negative sign means a loss]
Hence,
Impairment loss of $20 million