While parents, family, and community members may assume specific roles as they become involved in the education of children, for example as volunteers in the classroom (see Epstein and Connors' typology, 1993), a synthesis of the literature reveals three overarching roles that are created in the development and implementation of parent and community involvement programs (Lyons, Robbins and Smith, l983; Lynn, l994). Each of these roles is actualized in very different ways in relationships in classrooms, schools, and school districts:
Parents as the primary resource in the education of their children is best exemplified in home learning. Home learning is the activity, or set of activities, that parents and family members may engage in to help their children succeed academically. This partnership role between parents and/or family members and schools may have the greatest impact on achievement.
Parents and community members as supporters and advocates for the education of their children is facilitated through site-based school restructuring. Restructuring schools to create parent and community partnerships with schools focuses on organizational structure. Changing activities; creating new relationships between parents, families, communities, and schools; and implementing innovative strategies are ways that schools can restructure to facilitate parent and community involvement in this role.
Parents and community members as participants in the education of all children incorporates a broader vision in the partnership between schools and the populations they serve. Districtwide programs provide the vehicle for parents and community members to be involved in roles that reach beyond the immediate impact of an individual child to the impact on all children in the district.
Answer:
E. Zeenat plans to become a kindergarten teacher, she has a part-time job to help finance her education and plans to obtain her graduate degree in education in three years.
Explanation:
SMART stands for SPECIFIC, MEASURABLE, ATTAINABLE, REALISTIC, TIME-HORIZON.
if look at the above answer, it has all the qualities of a SMART goal.
Answer: =(B2+1.5)*(B3+1.5)*(B4+1.5)*(B5*1.5)
Explanation: my guess
Compare and contrast how people have historically treated natural resources and how this might change, using your new understanding of scarcity, conservation, and private property.
Answer: In the past people treated natural resources as an infinite source of wealth and commodity. But now that we know that there are physical limits to nonrenewable resources we have taken a new approach to preserve this resources by taking measures like natural resource management. A great example of this would be a private property regime where the resources benefits and duties fall under the owner(s).
I hope it helps, Regards.
Answer:
An excise subsidy has only a substitution effect since the subsidy artificially lowers the price of the subsidized good causing the consumer to increase consumption of the good, but no income effect.
Explanation:
The above is true due to the fact that the consumption of goods increases. This could have been reduced had it been that, there was never any excise subsidy on those goods.
