Answer:Hello! i am figuring this question out for you! one moment
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
Answer:
Portfolio B has a higher return but more volatile stocks. However it depends on how the individual can tolerate risks.
Explanation:
Expected return= free return + Beta (Expected rate of return – risk free rate)
Portfolio A
6%+ +.8*6%
= 6%+4.8%= 10.8%
Portfolio B
6%+1.5(6%)
6%+9%= 15%
It depends on different factors. Portfolio B has a higher return but more volatile stocks. However it depends on how the individual can tolerate risks.
Answer:
The correct option is (b)
Explanation:
Given:
Monthly payment for 6 months = $30 per month
Time period = 6 month (6 periods)
Monthly interest rate = 2%
In order to compute borrowed amount, present value of these payments need to be computed which is an annuity as same amount of $30 is paid.
Checking PVIFA table for 2%, 6 periods, annuity factor is 5.6014.
Borrowed amount = Monthly payment × PVIFA(2%,6)
= 30 × 5.6014
= $168.042
Borrowed amount is $168.042 or $168.22 approximately (difference in value due to annuity factor being rounded off)
The correct answer is C. By attending college, Connor actually stands better prospects to earn a significant salary throughout his lifetime. Employees having gone through post-secondary education generally earn more income than those who have not studied till college. The simple reason is, by attending college, you acquire sharper knowledge and insights of disciplines you wouldn't otherwise have access to. You get skills that are in line with a demanding and fast-paced environment. People often regret not attending college because they could have grabbed a certificate that could have been a stepping stone for professional opportunities and higher incomes.
