Answer:
In “The Farewell Address,” George Washington describes religion and morality as the two indispensable pillars which support political prosperity. He then says that we should be cautious about the idea that morality can flourish without religion and concludes with the assertion:
"Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
There is considerable debate about the religious opinions of the founding fathers, including Washington. Whether he meant it or not, however, this statement is clearly false. There is no clear correlation between religious principles and national morality, let alone any good evidence that one causes the other. This would have been less clear two hundred years ago, since practically every nation had an established church, from which it was often difficult for many people to dissent publicly. Nonetheless, it is now clear that secular nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Belgium are sustained by a national morality at least as strong as any religious nation. These countries have low rates of crime and particularly of violent crime. They have enlightened, compassionate social policies which enjoy the support of the majority of citizens. Their presses are freer and their political systems less corrupt than the average in Europe, let alone worldwide. They conform in every material respect to the founding fathers’ notion of political prosperity.
I believe it is 71 B.C correct me if im wrong
The Corpis juris (or luris) civilid is the modern name for a collection of fundamental works in jurisprudence, Issued from 529 to 534 by order of justinian I, Eastern roman emperor
True.
“From 1910 to 1940, Angel Island was the site of an U.S. Immigration Station that functioned as the West Coast equivalent of Ellis Island”
Considering the available options, the reason the transfer of power after the election 1800 was significant is that "<u>It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer."</u>
<h3>The United States Presidential Election of 1800</h3>
Following the Presidential election of 1800, the incumbent party, the Federalist Party, lost the election to the Democratic-Republican Party.
John Adams was the incumbent President that lost the election to Thomas Jefferson and yet calmly transferred power to the election winner.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that a correct answer is an option. D. <u>"It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer."</u>
Learn more about US Election here: brainly.com/question/13474496