Answer: (B) Inelastic
Explanation:
According to the question, when the price of the t-shirt get increased then it generate the high revenue. This result into the decrease in the given quantity and it is smaller change as compared to the change in the price.
This process of the quantity results into the good in the inelastic. Inelastic is the term which is refers to the static quantity of the various types of good and the services and its price are get changed.
Therefore, Option (B) is correct.
Answer:
Given that Honduras is a small economy in Central America, and it keeps a fixed exchange rate with the US, and capital is perfectly mobile, but interest rates are three percent in the US and six percent in Honduras, the explanation of the difference in these interest rates are as follows:
Honduras has a higher interest rate, meaning that its sovereign bonds pay higher values than the American ones, as well as its banks also pay higher interests on their investments compared to American banks.
This is so for a double reason: on the one hand, because the Honduran economy is less reliable than the American economy, which is larger and therefore more solvent and capable of overcoming eventual crises, with which the risk of default is less.
On the other hand, the Honduran economy is more dependent on foreign investment, so it must offer higher interest rates to attract such investments.
Answer:
E) None of these
Explanation:
Calculation to determine which of the following is the mean time between arrivals
Using this formula
Mean time between arrivals = 1/Arrival rate
Let plug in the formula
Mean time between arrivals= 1/12
Mean time between arrivals= 0.0833 hours or 5 minutes
Therefore the Mean time between arrivals will be 0.0833 hours or 5 minutes
Leadership is showing the way to people and making people better.
Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.
