The motivation to eat is influenced by option 1.) all of these factors.
Motivation to eat comes from both homeostatic and non-homeostatic factors. Homeostatic refers to physical, chemical, and internal conditions of the human body. When the motivation of eating occurs due to signals sent by the brain, it is called homeostatic eating.
Homeostatic eating includes biological factors. On the other hand, non-homeostatic factors include the factors external to the body where eating is done for reasons other than biological. It includes psychological, social, and cultural factors which initiate the motivation to eat. For instance, stress can trigger the motivation to eat.
Learn more about factors influencing food habits here brainly.com/question/16714843
#SPJ4
<span>Joanne is in the recoil phase. This phase is within the process known as recovery from sexual violence. They are divided into 3 stages;
The first is the reaction phase and occurs immediately after the sexual assault, characterized by a state of disbelief, fear, guilt, anger, and shame.
The second is the phase of recoil, in this phase the person is apparently calmer, but feelings of distress appear occasionally and there is still no healing process.
<span>The third phase is that of reorganization, in this phase the survivor feels that he has control over his emotions and feels less and less anguish or memories of what happened.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Areas where air is warmed often have lower pressure because the warm air rises and are called low pressure systems. Places where air pressure ishigh are called high pressure systems. ... Winds blow towards the low pressure, and the air rises in the atmosphere where they meet
Answer:
Europeans even though we're much fewer they had superior weapons while Africans were living in quite primitive conditions
If you follow the steps proposed by the CRAAP test you can check whether the one responsible for the news/article(s) has any motivation to favor one side of the story, if the story is relevant, for instance, what is more relevant for the future of a nation? A governmental transaction or what a famous person has to say about Trump or Obama? Maybe highlighting the latter would be a strategy to hide or diminish the impact of the former piece of news, a smoke screen because itis easier to dwelve into what somebody says, gossip, than to check the truthfulness of some information about what is going on with some politicians.
Also, sometimes people get half of the story or are simply misled to believe a distortion of the true facts, that is why it is important to check if the information is verifiable and indeed if the information is true.
