I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Native American tribes, weather, the tail itself, illness, loss of food or cattle, and the distance of the trail for the time people were walking.
Answer: Can you tell us the sentence?
Explanation:
Answer:
Allport's personality trait theory
Explanation:
Unlike some other approaches to studying personality, trait approaches focus on – rather than on – of behavior. these approaches emphasize – that remain generally consistent in a person. examples of trait approaches include Allport's personality trait theory and eysenck's biological trait theory.
<span>She fears reprisal, and when she is in the court preparing to tell the truth about Abigail, she ends up showing signs of being manipulated. Her testimony also shows that she finds many things threatening, and these threats cause her testimony to be highly inconsistent.</span>
