Answer:
2. a commercial
3. below
4. They are trtying to sell clorox wipes
5. They are trying to persuade people to buy them by showing a review by a mom.
6.
Explanation:
Answer:
Texas V. Johnson was a case in which the supreme court ruled that burning the flag was constitutionally protected by our first amendment rights (freedom of speech)
Explanation:
Answer:
No error is the answer.
Explanation:
The sentence is completely alright. There are no mistakes at all.
Answer:
<em>(C) offering a specific example to support a general claim
</em>
Explanation:
If there is only one claim: "Things which today seem unremarkable could have altered the course of history once...."
<em>Even the answer choice's clarification mentions "the claim": </em>
The second paragraph provides detailed details–perhaps even the position nutmeg played in New York history–to support the argument that apparently inconspicuous things can change the course of events.
So, shouldn't alternative "author say" consider instead of "author claims"?!
