1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexeev081 [22]
3 years ago
8

Why were the french anti-german by 1900

History
1 answer:
larisa86 [58]3 years ago
5 0
By the beginning of the 20th century, many nations were experiencing a surge of nationalism and self-confidence in regards to their place within the international system, this was the case for the French and German nations. Both states had experienced prior years of warfare and tensions, this had resulted in French territories of Alsace-Lorraine being annexed by Germany, France also feared the dominant economic interests of Germany on the European continent following its industrial and economic boom in the late 19th century. 
You might be interested in
Did Mary Jackson go to 2 university’s
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

A native of Hampton, Virginia, she graduated from Hampton Institute in 1942 with a dual degree in Math and Physical Sciences, and accepted a job as a math teacher at a black school in Calvert County, Maryland.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By what two other unofficial names is world war 1 regarded
gladu [14]
World War I was also known as The Great War, and The War to End All Wars. <span>It was the first time so many nations, and such a large percentage of the globe, was involved in a conflict. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
The Roman Empire and Han China were similar in that
Alex Ar [27]
Pretty sure it's B. They both have a strong centralized government
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ano ang antas ng teknolohiya ng <br>indus at tsina ​
mylen [45]

Answer:

Ang ilog ganges at brahmaputra ay mga ilog na siyang nagdadala ng mga tunaw na yelo mula sa kabundukan patungo sa kapatagan na siya namang nakaka tulong sa agrikultura.

Explanation:

sagot ko yan sa module.. share ko lang

8 0
3 years ago
After U.S.-led invasions in the early 2000s, Afghanistan and Iraq changed from dictatorships to democracies. Is it right to spre
rodikova [14]

Answer:

Although the United States intervened in Iraq after it began its intervention in Afghanistan, it is withdrawing from Iraq first. Therefore, what the United States has and has not accomplished in Iraq will be discussed first.

It must be said to begin with that the United States did achieve some important successes in Iraq. It destroyed the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein — something that the Iraqi population had not only been unable to do on its own, but may not have been able to do later either. If Saddam had managed to transfer power to his sons (who were reportedly just as, or even more, vicious than their father), the regime may have survived for years or even decades.

In addition, the U.S.-led intervention helped the Kurds in northern Iraq. They had suffered terribly under Saddam Hussein but were able to solidify the tenuous autonomy they had achieved (also with U.S. help) after the 1990-91 Kuwait conflict and even build some prosperity in their zone.

Although Iraq’s Arab Sunni tribes were initially hostile to the U.S.-led intervention and fought an insurgent war against it, American forces were eventually able to make peace and work with most of them.

Most important, the United States organized and protected the holding of relatively free and fair elections at both the national and local levels. This allowed Iraq’s Arab Shia majority, which had also suffered dreadfully under Saddam Hussein, to play a leading role in Iraqi politics for the first time.

In addition to these successes, however, the United States has had some noteworthy failures in Iraq. First, the failure to halt the massive violence, looting and infrastructure breakdown that took place throughout the country immediately after the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime. This was caused by the Bush administration’s failure to anticipate and plan for the aftermath of Saddam’s downfall as well as to deploy enough troops to maintain order. As a result, the initial gratitude displayed by much of the Iraqi population toward the United States for delivering it from Saddam quickly disappeared.

Further, despite a massive troop presence, the United States was unable to prevent or stop the large-scale ethnic-cleansing campaigns that violent Arab Sunni and Arab Shia groups conducted against each other’s communities. These campaigns were so successful that some observers attributed the decline in violence in Iraq in 2008-09 not to the American troop surge ordered by President Bush, but to the ethnic-cleansing campaigns having largely completed the violent work of segregating the Sunni and the Shia communities from each other.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Judeo Christian and Greco Roman principles contribute to the development of modern democracy in similar ways
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement about the Puritans is not true?
    10·2 answers
  • Kennedy and Civil Rights
    12·2 answers
  • Rewrite this statement: at the berlin conference, africans and europeans agreed that all of africa would remain free.
    6·2 answers
  • What sets a minaret apart from other tall architectural features
    15·1 answer
  • "Popular sovereignty" used in a sentence
    11·1 answer
  • ___________ is the name of a third party.
    5·1 answer
  • What is a mutual fund?
    12·1 answer
  • How would a Muscovite asses Atlantas sustainable strategies
    12·1 answer
  • Which political faction was most upset when the United States and Britain split territory in Oregon at the forty-ninth parallel
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!