Answer:
c. This statement is false.
Explanation:
Anti-Trust Department is the department in the united states that could enforced the anti-trusted law. They have the right to investigate onto the collusion, this could harm the competition that could lead the welfare loss
Since large share could be considered so it should be controlled and investigated
Therefore the given statement is false
The fact that the business that Bhat and Cho do as Data Security, means that for the purpose of collecting judgements and having accounting performed, most states would treat the firm as an <u>independent entity.</u>
<h3>What is an independent entity?</h3><h3 />
An independent entity is one that does not get counted along with the assets of its owners or partners. In other words, it is independent of the affairs of its owners and is treated as having its own identity.
In this case, the Data Security partnership that Bhat and Cho have will be treated as a separate entity from them which makes it an independent entity.
This is purely for the purpose of collecting judgement and having proper accounting records kept. And even at that, not all states in the United States will require this.
In conclusion, this is an independent entity.
Find out more types of entities at brainly.com/question/9993254
#SPJ1
Answer:. When patients participate in decision making and understand what they need to do, they are more likely to follow through.
Explanation:
The trial balance would disagree. It seems that the cash should be credited instead as the situation seems to me that the cash is being expended to pay for the equipment, and the remaining 3500 is liabilities. Therefore, the error should be corrected.
Answer:
C. personal appeal
Explanation:
Helene was using a classic personal appeal tactic when pleading JP no to tell on her. She relied on friendship and a personal relationship between them, which is what personal appeal is all about.
It is one of the <u>influence tactics</u>. If this was a<em> pressure tactic</em>, Helene would probably threat JP, which she didn't do in the example.
If it was a <em>coalition tactic</em>, Helene would try to get JP to help her persuade someone else, which is a non-existent aspect here.
<em>Legitimating tactics</em>, on the other hand, base on the authority gained by an individual's organizational position or some established policies.
<em>Exchange tactics</em> always imply some returned favors.
