Did not want to give up any of its power to a central council....i think
<span>This shows that there is a statistically significant difference between the two parties on the idea. The null hypothesis would have shown that there is no difference in the two parties. Party affiliation, then, will likely be indicative of the level of a person's support for the concept of welfare reform.</span>
Is lost over time when there is no attempt to retain it.
This is an example of <span>the system of checks and balances.
The system of checks and balances was created to limit government's power so it wouldn't transform into a tyranny.
the system divided the government into a Legislative branch which had the duty to create the low, Executive branch which had the duty to carried out the law, and the judicial branch which had the duty to handle every violation and disputes regarding the law.</span>
