A. A power struggle is created between the adult and the child.
Explanation:
The idea behind a time-out is to isolate a child from any human contact for a short period of time. However, this clause is not entirely true as an adult must be supervising the child for the entirety of the punishment.
The child will commonly disobey the rules of time-out, which will have the duration of the punishment reset in response. The result could be a unnecessarily long issue between both the adult and the child, with their relationship reaching a heated point. Clearly there is an issue present when it comes to having power over the child - they are actually not being controlled at all, as they would continue to disobey over and over.
<span>The correct answer is
letter d. It is hopeless because when the child would get used to this practice
and would arrive to a time where he or she will not get something from it. In
addition, it would make a child feel remote and alone which would affect his or
her confidence in the long run.</span>
Seems logical to me, in a democracy the public decides but obviously we can't run every single decision by every single inhabitant. That's why we choose who does, therefor voting is vital
