I think the answer is B because it says it in the passage on PLATO
The answer to this question is <span>Increasing; weakens the effects of both reinforcement and punishment..
The more delay being imposed between a response and a consequence, the more our brain not be able to find the correlation between that response and consequence. If the response and consequence happen instantly (for example we feel burnt when touching fire) that our body will most likely to remember the consequence of that certain response.</span>
Frances, like most people in her culture, avoids making eye contact with strangers. A conventionalist would call the action of making eye contact with strangers <u>impermissible.</u>
Conventionalists adhere to a belief that the principles and values, moral rules, social expectations and etiquette, are a creation of human society and therefore not immutable or universal; rather, they are specific to a particular culture.
For example, the prohibition against murder or stealing are not universal laws, applicable to all societies, but are created over time through agreements -implicit or explicit- between members of society.
Where making eye contact with strangers is against the norm, a conventionalist would argue that it is impermissible to commit that particular action.
To learn more about conventionalists: brainly.com/question/24316302
#SPJ4
The ideal thing to include to make an ethical argument to the viewers would be a clip from an interview with a highway enforcement officer.
<h3>What is project yellow?</h3>
High school and college students compete in Project Yellow Light, a film, billboard, and radio scholarship competition, where they produce gripping tales to persuade their classmates to adopt safe driving practices.
The author includes a source that is regarded as an authority on the subject by providing a tape from an interview with a highway patrol officer, in this case, a patrol officer discussing driving security.
Learn more about Project yellow light:
brainly.com/question/23858875
#SPJ1
