Answer: I would choose A.
Explanation:
<em>Well, for one... Louis the XVI was considerd ineffectual because he was usually depicted as rather a weak sort of king. Not really able to wield the strong centralized state in which his ancestors had crafted.</em>
<em> *And he was also seen as an honest man, who had good intensions, but who was most likely unfit for the strong task of reforming the monarchy; He basically wasnt the best man for the job... </em>
<span><em>~Therefore, He was ineffectual, just like the question states...
</em><em>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</em>
<em>~Hope this helped! Anymore questions, please feel free to ask. :)</em></span>
Explanation:
Gandhi was one of the most important leaders in the struggle for Indian independence. He headed the Indian National Congress and organized others in civil disobedience to protest British rule. After World War II, his hard work paid off when India gained independence from British rule.
Gandhi absolutely believed in using nonviolent approaches to solving life's problems. He protested against injustice and intolerance, and he was not afraid to do what he thought was right. He influenced many leaders, from Martin Luther King Jr. to Nelson Mandela. His legacy will continue long into the future.
Hope this helps.. Jai Hind
People would denounce each other in fear or in suspicion that the person they were denouncing was a communist, socialist or anarchist.
The system of Checks and Balances keeps each branch from getting too powerful so I would say, "<span>To make sure that no one group or individual had too much power."</span>
