The answer is B. They are easy to understand.
The utilization of Allegory has started a long time ago as it was simple for the readers and audiences to understand. It uses metaphor to enhance the meaning of the piece. It would be very hard to miss a point of this kind of writing since characters are most of the time pointedly named by the qualities the portray or represent.
The substitution of the name of an attribute or adjunct for that of the thing meant, for example, suit for<span> </span>the business executive<span>, or </span>the track<span> for </span>horse racing<span>.
</span>
Shakespeare's language, according to Johnson, is understandable. Shakespeare's characters are said to differ from one another in terms of how they use language.
Shakespeare is praised by Johnson, who says, "His theatre is the mirror of life." Johnson claims that because his plays are so realistic, we may learn useful information from them. The division of Shakespeare's plays into comedies and tragedies, in Johnson's view, is incorrect; he continues, "Shakespeare's plays are not in the rigorous and critical sense either tragedies or comedies, but compositions of a distinct kind." Eliot agrees that it is incorrect to categorize Shakespeare's dramas as tragic, comic, or historical. He believes that rational thought leads to moral thinking.
To know more about Shakespeare, refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/8912844
#SPJ4
am so sorry i dont recognize this question could you explain it again for me please
Answer:
OA. It makes a strong statement, implying something the reader
should do.
