All categories

2 years ago

Kyle and Joan are estimating the total weight three boxes that each weigh 14.62

Mathematics

1 answer:

Ber [7]2 years ago

8 0

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't exactly know what you are asking, but here is what I got and zi think you're asking

14.62*3= 43.86

43.86 rounds up to 44 and there is your estimation.

Together, the three boxes weigh about 44

p.s. Don't forget to include the weight name (ex. pounds, ounces, etc.)

You might be interested in

How do you write 3 2/4 as a fraction greater t hff an 1

elena55 [62]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps 3 over 4 hope this helps

3 0

2 years ago

Angles of a polygon <br>thanks ♡♡♡♡

FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

900 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the interior angles of a polygon can be found by

(n-2)*180 where n is the number of sides

This figure has 7 sides

(7-2)*180

5*180

900

7 0

2 years ago

What is 2,000 10 times as much as

ankoles [38]

2000 has three zeros and 10 has one, so you add another zero to 2000 so it makes it 20,000

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Angela practices piano for 5 hours on Sundays amd for 3 hours on all other days of the week. How many hours doea Angela practice

Kitty [74]

Answer:8 x 365=2920

Step-by-step explanation:

First, you add 5 + 3 which equals 8. Then there is 365 days in a year so you would multiply 8 times 365 which equals 2920.

Pretty sure this is right, hope it helps.

7 0

2 years ago

Ms.Omar runs the school tennis club. She has a bin of tennis balls and rackets. For every 5 tennis balls in the bin, there are 3

stepan [7]

Answer:

see the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

x ----> number of tennis balls

y ----> number of tennis rackets

we know that

To find out the ratio of tennis balls to tennis rackets, divide the number of tennis ball by the number of tennis rackets

In this problem we have

$\frac{x}{y}=\frac{5}{3}$

$x=\frac{5}{3}y$

That means

The number of tennis balls is three-fifths times the number of tennis rackets

see the attached figure to better understand the problem

8 0

2 years ago