The united states did.george washington as our first president.abraham lincoln was our sixteenth president.so yeah the unite dstates did.
Answer: Atlanta
Near the end of the war, a trio of Union armies, led by Gen. William T. Sherman converged upon Atlanta, where they were met outside the city by a desperate Confederate counterattack that failed.
The Battle of Atlanta was the bloodiest part of Sherman’s March through Georgia, costing the Union 3,700 casualties, while the Confederates lost 5,500 men. Sherman’s forces continued their advance and finally surrounded the city, besieging it for the entire month of August.
Finally, on September 1, Confederate Lt. Gen. John Bell Hood, a veteran of Antietam and Gettysburg who had lost his leg at the Battle of Chickamauga, gave up and abandoned the city, allowing Sherman’s forces to enter.
The capture of Atlanta crippled the Confederate war effort. For Lincoln, who faced a difficult election in 1864 against one of his former generals, George B. McClellan, the victory provided a lift at the polls, helping him win and pursue the war to its conclusion.
'A' is correct, with no qualifications.
'B' is correct, although the concept of "wandering" is far off base.
'C' is not true at all.
'D' is very weak, mostly on account of the nebulous concept of "worship".
There WAS no temple in Jerusalem, but there was plenty of worship, from
the time of the Exodus until the reign of Solomon. And then, although offerings
and "sacrifices" were brought to the Temple, and the entire population pilgrimaged
to the Temple on three occasions during the year, it's misleading to imply that no
Hebrew worship took place anywhere else.
The correct answer is C) A biography of a presidential candidate written by the candidate's main opponent.
The source that is the most likely to contain a problematic bias is "A biography of a presidential candidate written by the candidate's main opponent."
The rival candidate could find hard to maintain objectivity when writing the biography because he was his political rival and it is probable that he could have some resentments and differences that could bias the information of the book. It would be hard for him to write objectively and readers should read the information carefully, knowing that what is expressed in the biography could be biased and needed other sources to confirm its validity.
Answer:
False
Explanation: Hope this helps
