All categories

3 years ago

Defend or oppose Eisenhower's use of the cia for covert operations during the cold war

2 answers:

8 0

In the context of the Cold War, the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), created in 1947 from the new National Security Act sanctioned that same year, became a key piece of American anti-communist policy. As different authors point out, a sort of parallel state structure was articulated - a State within another State, with a large, separate and partially concealed budget, endowed with enormous powers and resources for the deployment of military activity without congressional control. If before the Eisenhower administration the so-called "covert activities" of the CIA were increasing ("the budget for covert operations had grown, from 4.7 million in 1949, to 82 million in 1952, the personnel involved in 302 to 2,812 with an additional 'staff per contract' of 3,142 overseas "), with his government they further increased their scale, with the CIA headed by Allen Dulles. In March 1954 the scope of what were considered "covert operations" was expanded: "propaganda, political action, economic warfare, flight measures, evasion and evacuation, subversion against hostile states or groups that include assistance to resistance movements, guerrilla and liberation groups; support for vernacular and anti-communist elements in the threatened countries of the free world; deceptive plans and operations, and all compatible activities that are necessary to achieve the purposes of this directive".

During the Eisenhower administration various covert actions were carried out by the CIA, highlighting the overthrow in August 1953 of the Iranian left-wing prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddeq, who had nationalized Iranian oil on March 20, 1951, and the establishment of a dictatorship by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi with the support of the United States; the overthrow in June 1954 of the government of Jacobo Arbenz Guzman in Guatemala; the coup d'état in South Vietnam in April 1955 and the establishment of the dictatorship of Ngo Dinh Diem; and the attempted coup in Indonesia in 1958. The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 was also discreetly supported, although without any direct involvement in a country that was a member of the Warsaw Pact.

The policies of covert actions carried out during the Eisenhower administration were positive and necessary, since we must remember that the country was immersed in the Cold War, so the threat of communism was latent and effective. Then, any action designed to weaken it should be carried out.

Anastasy [175]3 years ago

7 0

I will defend. The threat of nuclear war was very real during the Cold War. No expense could be spared in preventing this.

You might be interested in

why didn't the USSR respond with force to the East German and Polish revolts, as they had back in the 50s and 60s?

DochEvi [55]

Answer:

Eric Hobsbawm, the Marxist British historian, wrote a book called The Short Twentieth Century. The 20th Century had been shorter than other centuries because it had begun in 1914 with the outbreak of the First World War and terminated of course early in November 1989 with the fall of the Berlin Wall. The problem however, and of course we historians we like problems, is that everybody knew what we had left behind with the fall of the wall, but nobody knew what we were heading towards. As Douglas Hurd, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, put it, “this was a system [the Cold War], this was a system under which we had lived quite happily for 40 years.” Or as Adam Michnik, again my Polish solidarity intellectual, put it “The worst thing about communism is what comes afterwards.” While our populations were in jubilation in front of the television screens or on the streets of Berlin, governments were, it has to be said, seriously worried about the implications of this unforeseen, uncontrolled and uncontrollable collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the communist system. Tom Wolf, the American author, at the time had a bestseller called the Bonfire of the Vanities and a British MP that I knew at the time famously rephrased that as the ‘bonfire of the certainties.’ All of the reference points with which we’d lived for half a century and which had organized our diplomacy, our military strategy, our ideology, were like as many props that were suddenly pulled from us.

5 0

2 years ago

Write a review of Mabel Barbee Lee's title Cripple Creek Days, a book about life in one of the world's most famous and important

-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

Explanation:

Summary

After a youth spent in a Colorado gold mining town toward the finish of the nineteenth century and the turn of the twentieth, Mabel Barbee Lee documented her encounters in a diary named Cripple Creek Days. First distributed in 1958, the book is like an eye-witness record of the town's blast days from the perspective of a little youngster who has an eye for detail. Challenged person Creek Days opens with a forward from Lowell Thomas, one of Lee's students when she turned into the town's schoolmarm, who names his previous educator "The Mark Twain of Cripple Creek."

Lee was conceived in 1884, and when she was eight years of age, her dad carried the family to a boondocks town in Colorado's Pikes Peaks area. In 1892, Cripple Creek was only a makeshift camp settled in the mountains at a height of 9,500 feet. The Lees were there without a moment to spare to witness "the entire spot go to gold."

Lee's dad was a "gold seer," or miner, who chose to bring his hesitant spouse and three kids to search for metal in this new hotspot. Lee portrays exactly how troublesome and hardscrabble life was in a mining camp that had scarcely any comforts or markers of human advancement. Her dad is cherishing and fair, however hard-drinking and not generally the best chief. In the long run, he and his "divining pole" do locate a paying gold case on Beacon Hill, however the Lees barely miss turning out to be tycoons when he undercuts his case as opposed to completely investigating the find.

While Lee watches her dad's battles, she is likewise a sharp, wide-peered toward watcher of different occasions in the developing town. His story winds up being a microcosm for the destinies of many, plus or minus a godsend: "Challenged person Creek, by 1902, had created a sum of $111,361,633 and between thirty-five or forty bonanza rulers. Be that as it may, numerous who had unearthed fortunes, disregarding themselves, had a personnel for shedding them."

A great part of the activity of the book rotates around the appearance and advancement of trains. While making Cripple Creek famous, trains are regularly associated with wrecks that take phenomenal quantities of lives. All the more by and by, one of the most energizing occasions throughout Lee's life happens on a train that is assaulted by outlaws. As the criminals strip the payload and ransack the travelers, Lee conceals a silver dollar in her mouth trying to get it past them – ineffectively. She is fortunate to pull off her life.

Life at the turn of the twentieth century could be very hard for reasons having nothing to do with business astuteness. Lee unassumingly reports unforeseen debacles, for example, every single expending fire that are amazingly damaging in a town where most structures are wood, maladies of irresistible sickness that assault the occupants one after another before anti-toxins. A portion of these repulsion visit Lee's own family. Her dad experiences excavator's lung, an irritation of the bronchial tissues, while her more youthful sister agreements and kicks the bucket from one of seasonal influenza pandemics that clear its path through the town, slaughtering unpredictably during a time before influenza antibodies were accessible.

All through the diary, what comes through best is the amount Lee cherished her life at Cripple Creek regardless of its difficulties and her family's discontinuous torment. For her, the spot is associated permanently with her affection for her dad.

3 0

3 years ago

Spanish conquistador who conquered the aztecs

almond37 [142]

Hernàn Cortés was the Spanish conquistador who captured the Aztecs

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why were the Mongol armies so successful at conquest despite their relatively small size?

Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

A combination of training, tactics, discipline, intelligence and constantly adapting new tactics gave the Mongol army its savage edge against the slower, heavier armies of the times. The Mongols lost very few battles, and they usually returned to fight again another day, winning the second time around.

Found this on google, sorry if this isn't what you wanted. Have a great day/night and stay safe.

8 0

2 years ago

Analyze Effects What effects did the Great Awakening have on organized religion in the colonies?

geniusboy [140]

Answer:

it led colonists to become more active in their religion,

Explanation:

The Great Awakening affected the colonies in several ways, including that it led colonists to become more active in their religion, that it encouraged them to develop a more personal connection to religion, and that it contributed to the American Revolution by implying that religious authorities were not all-powerful.

3 0

2 years ago