<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.
<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.
<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.
So the answer is:
b. checking its conclusions against other sources
The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.
Explanation:
he was the only person in a group of a dozen other members to do it and the only way they would work
The correct answer is
<span>D.He defeated a Muslim invasion from Spain
Muslims conquered all of Spain and started getting into France. All the people of Europe got afraid when they saw this so they sought the help of Charles Martel who managed to beat them and force them back. The battle was considered to be a great and unexpected victory and many consider him to be a brilliant general for this battle.</span>
The answer is D.
William Patterson’s “New Jersey Plan” supported giving each state and equal amount of votes. Instead of the plan we use today which states that each state has the same number of senators and different numbers of congressmen (House of Representatives) based on the population of each state.
The reason why smaller states approved of this plan is because if each state has an equal amount of representatives, then the smaller states will be equal to states that have larger population. This plan is similar to The Articles to the Confederation. Which we know was not successful. Fortunately, people did not support this plan because they believed that this plan would make the national government they wanted weak.