That statement is false.
In most karate communities, sweeping dojo floor and picking up trash are the responsibility of all members,
They all commonly clean the room together right before and after a training session.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
1. soil characteristics
2. how far away the closest untouched ecosystems are
3. the habitat's remaining species
4. the presence of fungi as soil symbionts
Ecological succession refers to the process of changing in an ecological community's species composition through time. The time frame might span several decades or fewer (for instance, following a wildfire).
The community grows through an increase in complexity from a small number of pioneer plants and animals to a stable or self-sustaining climax community. The effects of established species on their own settings serve as the "engine" of succession and the reason why ecosystems evolve. Living has the effect of changing one's surroundings, sometimes subtly and sometimes blatantly.
To know more about Ecological succession refer to brainly.com/question/23762237
#SPJ4
Answer:
Laurence has an absolute advantage in both programs and sunglasses
Explanation:
"Absolute advantage" is used in economic terms which means the capability of an individual or organisation to produce or have an advantage of producing more product or services using the equal amount of resources is termed as having "absolute advantage" for that individual or organisation.
Here while writing programs, Laurence wrote 10 programs while Carrie Anne can wrote 5 programs.
And while making sunglasses, Laurence made 6 sunglasses while Carrie Anne made 4 sunglasses.
Thus it is seen that in both the cases, the productivity of Laurence is more than the productivity of Carrie Anne when using same amount of time.
Thus the answer is
"Laurence has an absolute advantage in both programs and sunglasses".
