•They were granted religious freedom (good)
•they didn’t know how to farm the land (bad)
There’s more but those are two huge ones from when the pilgrims arrived and created the mayflower compact
Answer:
The economy runs better without governmental involvement.
Explanation:
In the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith lays out a very robust theory about how the economy works, this is why many economists consider him to be the Father of the economic science.
Adam Smith's main thesis was that people, acting own their own interest, were guided by the invisible hand, leading to positive results that benefited the whole of society, even if that was not the main goal of economic actors in first place (their main goal being furthering their own interests).
For this reason, Smith thought that most government intervention was unecessary, since according to him, economic actors tended to self regulate in the market, and to produce an optimal result for society. He did justify some government intervention though: in the military, in the judicial system, and in some basic social services in order to care for the poor, the elderly, and the sick.
1) Factions can only arise in a consensus of freedom, because tyrannical governments do not allow opposition or different way of thinking, that is why a faction arises in the middle of freedom.
2) According to Tomas Jefferson, problems and internal differences were something that had to be accepted, and he preferred it instead of submitting to a foreign government that will inevitably create situations of oppression and tyranny. Jefferson had no problem dealing with factions, because he trusted the citizens who, well informed with their own government, would be able to settle differences and reach an agreement that would benefit all parties involved.
<span>The conclusion that can be drawn about the impact of Puritanism on the American political system is </span><span>D) Puritan beliefs were ideal, but impractical in application; therefore, they were largely abandoned when establishing the Constitution.</span>
Hello! The answer to your question would be <em>Newt Gingrich, Armey, Armey Gingrich, Dr Newt Gingrich.</em>
<em>If you are talking about the book I suppose</em>
<em>P.S (Do mind the fact that there is just Armey as one of the authors, the first name is an inappropriate word that Brainly does not allow me to put in)</em>
