1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
3 years ago
5

True or False: North America was not inhabited before Christopher Columbus arrived in 1492

History
2 answers:
Tasya [4]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

This is false.

Explanation:

North America was in fact inhabited before Christopher Columbus arrived in 1492. Five hundred years before Columbus, a band of Vikings led by Leif Eriksson set foot in North America and established a settlement. Also, long before that, some scholars believe, the Americas seem to have been visited by  travelers from China, and perhaps by visitors from Africa and maybe even Ice Age Europe.

katovenus [111]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

You might be interested in
(APUSH) What compromises made the union, kept the union, and made the union fall apart?
rodikova [14]
<span>he Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed. Opposition was intense, but ultimately the bill passed in May of 1854. Territory north of the sacred 36°30' line was now open to popular sovereignty. The North was outraged.The political effects of Douglas' bill were enormous. Passage of the bill irrevocably split the Whig Party, one of the two major political parties in the country at the time. Every northern Whig had opposed the bill; almost every southern Whig voted for it. With the emotional issue of slavery involved, there was no way a common ground could be found. Most of the southern Whigs soon were swept into the Democratic Party. Northern Whigs reorganized themselves with other non-slavery interests to become the REPUBLICAN PARTY, the party of Abraham Lincoln. This left the Democratic Party as the sole remaining institution that crossed sectional lines. Animosity between the North and South was again on the rise. The North felt that if the Compromise of 1820 was ignored, the Compromise of 1850 could be ignored as well. Violations of the hated Fugitive Slave Law increased. Trouble was indeed back with a vengeance.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Going oph~<br><br>bye tc<br>-_-<br>#kamina op bolte <br><br>✌ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✌​
UNO [17]

Bye mate

# kamina op bolte

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss how the United States and another government (United Kingdom or Russia) might approach global issues. Please explain and
Basile [38]

Hey Flower!

The U.S would approach a global issue by trying to send out our extra troops if we are available or by talking with the leaders of countries who are allies in wars.

Russia is the other nation a bit more likely than the UK. They would end up strategizing a way to fund a solution just as the US would or they will help by sending down sorts of weapons. 

Credit: Slipknot

6 0
3 years ago
What happened in the French Revolution
Anna71 [15]

Answer: :)

The French Revolution was a watershed event in modern European history that began in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s with the ascent of Napoleon Bonaparte. During this period, French citizens razed and redesigned their country’s political landscape, uprooting centuries-old institutions such as absolute monarchy and the feudal system. The upheaval was caused by widespread discontent with the French monarchy and the poor economic policies of King Louis XVI, who met his death by guillotine, as did his wife Marie Antoinette. Although it failed to achieve all of its goals and at times degenerated into a chaotic bloodbath, the French Revolution played a critical role in shaping modern nations by showing the world the power inherent in the will of the people.

8 0
3 years ago
According to Hamilton, what was a failure of the Articles of Confederation that would be corrected by the new
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

1. The government could not make laws under the Articles but would be able to under the Constitution.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation mandated the passage of constitutional law to entail the consent of at least nine of the thirteen states, and the adoption of an amendment mandated unanimous approval. This has made lawmaking difficult. this reflects the ineffectiveness of the government to make laws because more power was vested in state governments. Furthermore, each State has been granted the right to decide whether or not they wish to follow certain laws. On the other hand, federal government became more strong under the new constitution.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What would a master builder include when building a Gothic cathedral
    13·2 answers
  • The purchase of louisiana territory presented president jefferson with a problem because:
    8·1 answer
  • The foundations of Hinduism were formed when religion beliefs of the native Indians were combined with the beliefs of:
    10·1 answer
  • Marth or Luther translated which religious book from Latin into more commonly read language, German?
    15·2 answers
  • What caused the Western Roman Empire to fall? There was no single cause, and no sudden fall. Rome’s decline took place over many
    12·1 answer
  • State governments have the power to?
    10·2 answers
  • In literature, what is a subject?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Alien and Sedition Acts affect the election of 1800?
    8·2 answers
  • The Reagan Revolution of the early 1980s entailed *
    8·1 answer
  • PHOENIX, Sept. 20, 2012—Arizona's new immigration law takes effect this week. According to the law, police officers must check t
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!