Towns in deserts would naturally develop near oases because in a desert there is very little water and the water would be required to grow crops for food along with water to drink.
If there was only one house of representatives the smaller states will have less representation.
Explanation:
The original model of the house of representatives was taken from Britain. There are two senators per state and then there is the house of representatives where the number of members depends on the population of the state.
If the senate is removed, there will be less representation for the smaller states and thus there will be a chance they can be cornered.
The issue with this, is that constitutionally, all states are to be equal in the eyes of the federal government in the Federation.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
A legal declaration made by a candidate gives details of his educational qualifications, assets and liabilities and serious criminal cases pending against him. This provides an opportunity to the voters to make their decision on the basis of the information provided by candidates. Hope this helps :)
