Answer:
World-systems theory (also known as world-systems analysis or the world-systems perspective)[1] is a multidisciplinary approach to world history and social change which emphasizes the world-system (and not nation states) as the primary (but not exclusive) unit of social analysis.[1] "World-system" refers to the inter-regional and transnational division of labor, which divides the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries, and the periphery countries.[2] Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labor-intensive production and extraction of raw materials.[3] This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries.[3] Nonetheless, the system has dynamic characteristics, in part as a result of revolutions in transport technology, and individual states can gain or lose their core (semi-periphery, periphery) status over time.[3] This structure is unified by the division of labour. It is a world-economy rooted in a capitalist economy.[4] For a time, certain countries become the world hegemon; during the last few centuries, as the world-system has extended geographically and intensified economically, this status has passed from the Netherlands, to the United Kingdom and (most recently) to the United States.[3]A world map of countries by their supposed trading status in 2000, using the world system differentiation into core countries (blue), semi-periphery countries (purple) and periphery countries (red). Based on the list in Dunn, Kawana, Brewer.
World-systems theory has been examined by many political theorists and sociologists to explain the reasons for the rise and fall of states, income inequality, social unrest, and imperialism.
Trust me mark me as brainliest trust me
Answer:
The answer is the supremacy clause.
Explanation:
The Supremacy Clause is established in the Constitution of the United States and states that the federal laws were made according to the Constitution. It also establishes that the different treaties that are made under its authority are considered the "supreme Law of the Land", and in this way, it is most important than any conflicting state laws.
It establishes that state courts, as well as state constitutions, are subordinated to the supreme law. However, the different federal statutes and treaties are considered supreme only in case they do not violate the terms established in the Constitution.
When grocery shopping with his mother, 4-year-old Hakim sometimes throws temper tantrums if his mother refuses his requests for a particular snack food. Parent-training experts would suggest that his mother should
A) threaten to punish Hakim if he continues his tantrums.
B) offer to buy the snack food Hakim wants only if he quiets down and behaves himself.
C) continue shopping while ignoring Hakim's tantrums.
D) return any snack foods that are already in her cart to the store shelves.
Answer:
C. continue shopping while ignoring Hakim's tantrums
Explanation:
Parents-training experts has suggested that children, mostly between age 1-4, usually communicate through temper tantrums, such that, they seek to get the attention of their parents or caregiver through tantrums.
Hence, it is suggested that, ignoring is usually most effective for behaviors like whining, crying when nothing is physically wrong or hurting.
Therefore, if parents or caregivers consistently ignore these behaviors, they will eventually stop.
