The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "The canal was seized to negotiate better trading relations with Britain, France, and the United States." Egypt's president Nasser seize the Suez Canal in 1956 because The canal was seized to negotiate better trading relations with Britain, France, and the United States.<span>
</span>
Not really,
It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
Hundreds of jobs, new economic development, and also major stock changes. It also brought city crises.
False: many missionaries were murdered and slaughtered due to their forceful way of teaching Native Americans
Answer:
The answer is below.
Explanation:
China operates a practically communist style of governance, which in turn limits the citizen's freedom to a certain degree.
On the other hand, India practices democracy thereby giving the citizen more freedom to pursue their individual goals.
China, being a communist country, limits the citizen's rights of expression and press.
Whereas, India, being a democratic country, gives its citizens the rights to express themselves and the press to cover and broadcast available and credible information
