Answer:
C. State constitutions guaranteed individual liberties.
Explanation:
The 1787 ratification of the Constitution of the United States was one of the major issues of discord between the supporters and opposers of the process. They are known as the Federalists and anti-Federalists.
The main argument of the Anti-federalists was that the federal government will have a massive hold over the people and restrict or minimize individual freedom. They believed that this new Constitution will lead to tyranny and reduce the powers of the state. To them, they wanted the division of power between the national and state governments, for a strong national government will only give more power to the President and individual state powers will lead to oppression. So, their argument was for a state government that will guarantee and allow individual liberties.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
Answer:
Accidental reinforcement
Explanation:
Accidental reinforcement occurs when a reinforcer casually concurs with a positive outcome, so the person associate the outcome with the reinforcer. This type of reinforcement is usually the source of superstitious behaviours.
In this case, Roger associated the fact of wearing green underwear to the good grade he got in his test, the green underwear was the reinforcer that casually concurs with the positive outcome which in this case was the good grade, so Roger started associating both and now he wears green underwear on test days.
Relative deprivation is a term that refers to that people join social movements because they feel deprived relative to other people with whom they identify.
<h3>What is relative deprivation?</h3>
It alludes to a starting point to analyze why people join social movements as a result of a situation of inequality within people with whom they identify.
An individual experiences said deprivation when he lacks common goods in other individuals and families in the social environment, affecting his effective situation.
Therefore, we can conclude that relative deprivation is a term that refers to that people join social movements because they feel deprived relative to other people with whom they identify.
Learn more about relative deprivation here: brainly.com/question/26869272
#SPJ4
Answer: A. High- High
Explanation: Ethical dissonance as such arises due to inconsistencies in attaining and maintaining a moral image of oneself and being tempted to exploit some unethical situation for the sake of personal gain. In other words, it is the interaction of the company / organisation and the individual with the aim of adapting the individual and the organisation in different possible situations and scenarios. It is a two-way process because the ethics of an individual influences the organisation, simply the individual enters his / her ethics. Also the ethics of the organisation influences the behaviour of the individual.
Of the four possible fit models / options, high-high is one of two fit options that have a high person-organisation fit. So this is a model that provides a fit relationship between the organisation and the individual. When an individual has a high level of ethics, and organisation too, fit with an organisation of course high. That's the case here.
There is another high fit, therefore the agreement of organisations and individuals, but this is not the case here, when a person is of low ethics. Then for that individual it is a high fit of course if it is also a low ethics organisation, such an organisation suits a low ethics individual.
The other two cases of fit are when there is a low level of fit between the organisation and the individual.
It should be lowered and stay lowered for are own safety hope this helped
