The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
- For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.
This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.
More information:
brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults
Its House Arrest because my friend did the same thing and thats what he got
Answer:
a. People have the right to know what information about them is stored and how it is being used.
b. Personal information collected for one purpose can be used for another purpose without the person's consent.
c. There must be no personal data record-keeping systems whose very existence is secret.
d. People have the right to correct errors in the information about them.
Explanation:
All of these are part of the guidelines that are included in the Code of Fair Information Practices.
The Code of Fair Information Practices was created by the HEW (Health, Education, Welfare) Advisory Committee on Automated Data Systems established in 1972. The principles stated in this code guide the behaviour of information technology. Their main purpose is to protect the user of such systems, while granting them control over their own information.
Alexis your my sister you know my middle name ..... its Elizabeth
Explanation:
