Answer:
Successful project management requires a precise set of skills, knowledge, flexibility, and creative problem-solving. Seasoned project managers know that along with years of experience comes a greater understanding of the complex interrelationships between all parts of a project from set-up to completion.
Explanation:
Leading effective projects requires not only strong general leadership skills, but also a methodological and responsive set of core processes and abilities.
The five phases are:
Initiating Process Group
Defines the beginning of the project, setting all permits, authorizations and initial work orders in place to secure an effective and logical progression of initial project activities. Setting clear phases to work to be completed.
Planning process group
set strategic plans in place to maximize workflow, and begin to assemble priority lists and plan team needs. Addresses a more narrow clarification of all project goals and expectations and puts in place the project infrastructure necessary to achieve the goals according to the timeline and the budgetary constraints.
Executing process group
Involves managing teams effectively while orchestrating timeline expectations and reaching benchmark goals.
Monitoring and control process group
Processing change orders, addressing on-going budget considerations, and mitigating unforeseen circumstances that may affect a team’s ability to meet initial project expectations.
Closing process group
addresses the culmination of strong project management skills demonstrated throughout the other interrelated processes that guided the project. Following through to close all aspects of the process and submitting necessary paperwork on time
Some of the challenges that can be encountered during the process are:
securing necessary financial resources, and setting communication in place with stakeholders.
Phasing determinations are made so that a timeline and outcome benchmarks can be set in place.
Identifying and quantifying all stakeholders and other individuals who are impacted by the project.
Preparing the project charter.
Setting the teams in place to get the work done efficiently and effectively.
obtaining permits.
Supporting teams with the tools and knowledge needed to do the job most effectively
make sure no pieces have been left undone.
making last minute budget adjustments.
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms.
<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>
<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>
<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>
<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>
<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
Question- Which statement best explains the effect of Squealer’s propaganda on readers?
Answer:
Readers think that the animals are naive to believe Squealer’s lies.
edge 2020
