The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is: The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.
A parliamentary debate is held in academic settings and it originated from the British Parliament. In a parliamentary debate their are two sides who have their own points and support them with evidence.
In the chosen option, we see that the Taft team had a counterclaim. Even though they were making an argument, they did not have a supporting evidence.
This shows that they were engaging in a parliamentary debate that they were not properly prepared for.
Learn more about parliamentary debates here:
brainly.com/question/1695492
Answer:
Out of all of us, Jash was the one. If you need punctuation
Explanation:
1. First, read the sentence listed at the top of the Q & A Flow box.
2. Next, read the question.
3. Then, write the answer to the question in the blank. Use the sentence at the top of the box to help you
answer the question. Work through the remaining questions in the box in the same way. This is called
classifying the sentence.
4. Finally, look at the sentence at the bottom of the box. Classify the sentence again, using the same
questions and answers in the exact order. But this time, you will label the words in the sentence with the
appropriate abbreviations for the parts of speech. (The abbreviations are shown in parentheses in each
Question and Answer Flow provided.)
hope i helped brodie
Answer:
This paper is reproduced by kind permission of the Lancet, where it first appeared as:
Bland JM, Altman DG. (1986). Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet, 346, 1085-7.
