All categories

3 years ago

One important benefit of a multiparty system over a two-party system is that ____________.

1 answer:

3 0

<span>Actually one important benefit of a multiparty system over a two party system is that there will not be any single powerfull person controlling like a king or queen what ever and when ever he or she wants, without considering or taking consent of main important peoples, and also it gives more opinions and options in a multiparty system for the benefit of people.</span>

You might be interested in

How much did the cast of scrubs get paid per episode?

OlgaM077 [116]

350,000 they got paid per episode

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

g Curtis invests $425,000 in a city of Athens bond that pays 6.25 percent interest. Alternatively, Curtis could have invested th

Advocard [28]

Answer:

The explicit tax would Curtis incur on interest earned on the Initech, Inc. bond is $7,395

Explanation:

The computation of the explicit tax is shown below:

= (Invested amount × interest rate with similar risk) × marginal tax rate

= ($425,000 × 7.25%) × 24%

= $30,812.50 × 24%

= $7,395

We consider the invested amount, similar risk interest rate, and the marginal tax rate. The paying interest rate would not be considered. Hence, ignore it

5 0

2 years ago

Assume that labor and capital are the only two inputs a perfectly competitive firm uses to produce wheat. The firm hires its inp

noname [10]

The price of wheat per ton must be $4 when profit-maximizing combination is employed.

<h3>What is Price?</h3>

This is defined as the amount of money that has to be paid to acquire a given product.

To get the price per ton for the company to make profit, we find the ratio of the unit price of labor to the marginal product of labor.

$8 / $2 = $4.

Read more about Price here brainly.com/question/24877850

5 0

2 years ago

Assume the factory is currently producing 40 chairs and 30 tables and an order comes in for 5 more tables . What is the opportun

aleksklad [387]

Explanation:

I dont really know. You can ask the tutors tho.

5 0

2 years ago

Sam and Lisa run a catering business in which they have two major tasks: getting new clients and preparing food for events and p

igomit [66]

Answer:

In this scenario, <u>LISA</u> has both an absolute advantage in food preparation, and <u>LISA</u> has a comparative advantage in food preparation.

Assume that initially, Sam and Lisa are splitting both tasks for a large number of events. Then they decide to start shifting some work according to the principle of comparative advantage. In particular, the person with the comparative advantage in food preparation will take over preparing food for one more event, and the other person will use the freed-up time to get more clients. As a result, the total number of events for which food is prepared will remain unchanged, but the number of new clients will increase by <u>1</u>.

Before they were getting 3 new customers since Sam got 2 and Lisa 1, but since Sam will only look for clients, then the total number of clients will be 4 (or 1 more).

Explanation:

It takes Sam 12 hours to prepare the food for an event and 3 hours of effort to get each new client.

Sam's opportunity cost of preparing food = 12/3 = 4 new clients
Sam's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 3/12 = 0.25 of food preparation

For Lisa, it takes 10 hours to prepare food for an event and 5 hours to get a new client.

Lisa's opportunity cost of preparing food = 10/5 = 2 new clients
Lisa's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 5/10 = 0.5 of food preparation

7 0

3 years ago