Answer:
No
Explanation:
I think this shows how this was a failed version of democracy as the people that revolted were not heard and not pleased. Even though in france and Americas case there revolutions were not really just, it shows that the country representing them failed to please the people.
Theirs heads. This veil is called a hijab
Answer:New France, French Nouvelle-France, (1534–1763), the French colonies of continental North America, initially embracing the shores of the St. Lawrence River, Newfoundland, and Acadia (Nova Scotia) but gradually expanding to include much of the Great Lakes region and parts of the trans-Appalachian West.
Explanation:
Answer:
d
Explanation:
"Political repression is the act of a state entity controlling a citizenry by force for political reasons, particularly for the purpose of restricting or preventing the citizens ability to take part in the political life of a society, thereby reducing their standing among their fellow citizens."
It determined that only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce.
The case of Gibbons v. Ogden regarded the interstate shipping trade and whether or not the states could regulate or if it was Congress's job to regulate.
The decision from the Marshall Court stated it was the job of Congress under the Commerce Clause to regulate trade between states to include shipping. New York was not able to regulate the trade taking place in the waterways between states. One of the justices included in a supporting decision that the federal interstate laws superseded the state laws and the federal government was the ultimate power on interstate trade.
